RSS

A Lutheran anthropology for non-Lutherans (my post-Broken philosophical and apologetical round-up) – part II of III

04 Jan
The philosopher Aristotle, "the worst enemy of grace" (Luther)

The philosopher Aristotle, “the worst enemy of grace” (Luther)

Part I

I submit theology has often been derailed by philosophical musings where biblical claims have been made to submit to philosophical categories and this actually ends up altering the biblical content (as is the case with someone like Thomas Aquinas [using Aristotle] and I suspect is the case with someone like Kierkegaard).  I don’t foresee how that might happen with what I’m about to do here.

Again, jumping off of Pastor Fisk’s book as well as all other helpful authors, I’ve got what I think is a helpful apologetic approach based on three propositional claims which I have stated very carefully (it is a bit of a reframe of Fisk’s presentation, which I consider highly insightful and valuable).  Mankind has always and always will seek to reach three fundamental things:

Understanding and knowledge of the powerful Mind responsible for the cosmos “out there”.  Stated in a more refined way, this desire is also accompanied with the desire to recognize and to understand what is true, the origin and order of what is, what exists.

I will call this the Primary principle.

Understanding of the kinds of universal behaviors that result in growth, harmony and blessing for human beings.  Stated in a more refined way, this desire is also accompanied with the desire for what should be or ought to be, relating to that which is good and beautiful.

I will call this the Behavior principle.

Happiness for one’s self and those one desires to be found with – family, like-minded friends, and chosen others.  Stated in a more refined way, this desire is also accompanied with the desire for long-term, meaningful, and fulfilling pleasures, not only short-term and fleeting excitements.

I will call this the Happiness principle.*

Now, people generally don’t care about thinking for “its own sake” in route to happiness, or fulfillment – that is, apart from living, moving and having our being as the Greek poet (and Apostle Paul) said.  We note that the rise of “abstract philosophy” apart from philosophy which is for living is a relatively recent trend in world history.  Further, of course there is unavoidable overlap in these imperfect principles (simple categories we can all recognize at some level – notions of “essentialism” need not be brought into this discussion).  Also, note that it is true that for some who insist there is no Divine Mind (above that which is purely “physical” or “material” – there are more persons saying this today), what is good, beautiful, and just for example, are “objective” only in the sense that they and others (whom they desire to be found with) choose to insist that they are – which simply means they are not (see here for more).  I contend even they cannot ultimately escape the philosophical categories I have set up for all of us.

Most importantly, these three things (and all the action that follows from them) are to be achieved – at the very least in part – through mankind’s own powers and strength – his own moral, rational, and even mystical powers, as Pastor Fisk says.  Power and strength are therefore the key things man possesses and that attain “salvation”, however defined.  Money and possessions certainly may be seen to be of help here, sometimes going hand in hand with these.  Interestingly, all of fallen man is “conservative” in this sense, in that he seeks to preserve, or conserve himself (and those he chooses to remain with and be found with) through his own power… his own willed choices to cooperate with the God or gods he worships.  Even if life after death is denied, the choices we make by our own free powers somehow echo in the life to come.

Alternatively, the Christian God, ever “liberal” with His goodness towards all people, overturns everything about this hopeless task – these things are to be ultimately had and understood only through His powerful love – a strength which overturns the world and is made perfect through weakness  – in line with the simple and humble forms whereby God chooses to reveal Himself and come to us in His forgiving and transforming words.  This grace is first and foremost to be understood not as a heavenly fuel that powers us in our choices, but as the disposition of a loving Triune God towards his fallen creatures – “sinners are ‘attractive’ because they are loved; they are not loved because they are attractive”Only in this way is the demonic (led by Satan), death, and the curse of sin (and its manifold manifestations) overcome.

And only in this way are men made whose primary goal is to dwell in the House of the Lord forever – to fully know the joys given by the One who bought them with His own precious blood.  Only in this way, are men created who strive and long for their full sanctification in, with, and through Jesus Christ.**

Part III on Monday

Image from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg

*-Some might contend that the Behavior principle and Happiness principle must go together.  And yet, for example, while behavior leading to children – and children who are nurtured well – is essential to humanity continuing and flourishing, social historian Peter N. Stearns, in his insightful book on happiness, “Satisfaction not Guaranteed”, points out that in late 20th century polls and surveys couples who decide to remain childless report having the highest levels of personal happiness. Also note that even if the “pursuit of happiness” is seen to be problematic from a Christian perspective (necessarily or potentially), simply desiring satisfaction and contentment for one’s self, one’s family, and one’s neighbor is unobjectionable. 

**-As Pastor Fisk notes, there is a “higher level of faithfulness to pursue”, “[the] possibility of finding actual true growth”, and “objective maturity” (Fisk, 210).  Of course, it is critical that the pursuit of these things be put in the proper context and understood rightly. His book is a terrific antidote to the false notions that are pervasive today.

Advertisements
 
4 Comments

Posted by on January 4, 2013 in Uncategorized

 

4 responses to “A Lutheran anthropology for non-Lutherans (my post-Broken philosophical and apologetical round-up) – part II of III

  1. samwise57

    January 25, 2013 at 9:57 pm

    “theology has often been derailed by philosophical musings where biblical claims have been made to submit to philosophical categories and this actually ends up altering the biblical content ”

    I see this in certain “Apologists” who imitate Aquinas to insist God is bound to the “Law of Non-Contradiction” as if it was higher than God Himself instead seeing it as something He gaves us! I believe that is backwards!

    In the Lamb,

     
  2. infanttheology

    January 25, 2013 at 10:05 pm

    Samwise,

    Yes, like I said in part I: It’s well and good to say that God is good and cannot act contrary to His nature – but not if we are going to define “good” or “just” in a way that is at odds with the Scriptural witness.

    Also, have you seen Fisk’s video “Most magisterial tulips?” It is quite a ride, and touches on the right use of reason. The finite can contain the infinite….

    +Nathan

     
    • samwise57

      January 25, 2013 at 10:10 pm

      Will watch! His videos are awesome and can I use a nasty word abou his work — “Relevant” (however, not in the way Wagner, et. al would use it! 🙂

       
  3. infanttheology

    January 25, 2013 at 10:29 pm

    Relevant in that the word of God aptly spoken always is…

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Sense & Reference

libraries and philosophy

Reliable Source (This is a)

Overcoming "Fake News" and Beyond

The Jagged Word

"What the Hell is going on!"

ROUGH TYPE

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Meditationes Sacrae (et Profanae)

A blog concerning theology, faith, the humanities, and Interesting Things

Pyromaniacs

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Proslogion

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Blog – AlbertMohler.com

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Worldview Everlasting

Jonathan Fisk exposits on all things Lutheran.

De Profundis Clamavi ad Te, Domine

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Mercy Journeys with Pastor Harrison

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Abide in My Word

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Blogia

The Blog of LOGIA: A Journal of Lutheran Theology

Gottesdienst Online

Just another WordPress.com weblog

GetReligion

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Todd's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

theologia crucis

Just another WordPress.com weblog

The Boar's Head Tavern

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Glory to God for All Things

Orthodox Christianity, Culture and Religion, Making the Journey of Faith

Eclectic Orthodoxy

"I'm a blogger, dammit, not a theologian!"

Jonathan Last Online

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Steadfast Lutherans

An international fraternity of confessional Lutheran laymen and pastors, supporting proclamation of Christian doctrine in the new media.

www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/

Just another WordPress.com site

Reformation500

A forum for exploring the historical truths of Christianity reclaimed by the Reformers

Surburg's blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Weedon's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

First Thoughts

A First Things Blog

Pastoral Meanderings

Just another WordPress.com weblog

%d bloggers like this: